Saturday, 17 August 2019

impact of climate change on marginal insects

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ANd POPULATION ABUNDANCE OF CERTAIN MARGINAL INSECTS: PREDICTING THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN A TROPICAL MAN MADE LAKE.
Dr. Asma Ali ( Ecologist )


  • Shoreline insects are a vital component of food web of aquatic as well as terrestrial ecosystems, which also act as pollution indicators and are more or less associated with water. Climatic factors are expected to have an important effect on marginal insect survivorship and reproductive success, since temperature, humidity and rainfall have acted as a forcing function with respect to understanding the insect abundance and population dynamics.
  • No significant work has been done in the tropical large man made lakes, hence in the present work the population abundance of marginal hemipterans has been examined from shorelines of Upper Lake Bhopal, a large man made lake with reference to the potential effects of climate change on insect community.
  • The abundance and community structure of marginal insects especially hemipterans showed strong evidence of impact of temperature (ambient as well as water) in comparison to abundance values which demonstrated high significance (P<0.05) between all the sampling stations.
  • The analysis indicates that community structure may be fairly resilient to climate change. The displacement and local extinction of species, especially the species that are found at only one sampling station however, may lead to significant changes in community composition



INTRODUCTION:
Temperature is one of the most important factors that influence the development rate of shoreline insects. Among insects, the relationship of developmental rate to constant temperature tends to be nonlinear. Development does not occur below a low temperature until an optimum is reached. Numerous studies determined an appropriate developmental rate function for phonological or population models that can be used under a variety of conditions to predict important events in the insect’s abundance for control strategies (Briere et al., 1999, Voldovinos et al., 2007, Adandedjan et al., 2010, Shin-Ya et al., 2010, Murray et al., 2012, Sangle et al., 2015). Over the coming century, shifting climate zone is going to affect the distribution and abundance of many invertebrate aquatic species, potentially leading to changes in the structure and composition of species and communities. Environmental gradients are a useful tool for understanding the role of current climate in structuring insect communities and have been used as a surrogate for predicting responses to future climate change. Little is known about factors that currently determine the abundance and distribution of most invertebrate species, in tropical lakes of India, thus restricting our ability to predict how these species, and the communities they live in, will respond to a rapidly changing climate in the coming period.
In the case of marginal insect communities, the effects of factors such as host plant chemistry, phylogeny, and architecture are also known to be important determinants of community composition (Walther 2002, Boyero 2002, Briers & Biggs 2003 and Heino 2009).  Further, many comparisons of community structure between tropical and temperate regions have been limited, making generalizations difficult.
However in tropical regions the distribution of marginal insects, which depends on the ecological balance between various climatic factors such as temperature, humidity and rainfall, gets greatly modified by the changes in humidity and vice-versa (Voldovinos et al., 2007, Adandedjan et al., 2010, Shin-Ya et al., 2010).
For the past fifteen years, an increasing number of studies have been focused and published on biodiversity. This is principally due to the fact that the world's flora and fauna are disappearing at rates greater than the historical mass extinction events (Root et al., 2003). As suggested by Shin-Ya et al. (2010), there is an 18% to 35% risk of species level extinction resulting from climate changes in the year 2050. Moreover, other processes such as agricultural expansion, for example, in response to an increasing demand for food have a negative impact on biodiversity as a result of habitat destruction (Tilman et al., 2001).
In the present study, our objective was to study the insect abundance of shorelines of a large tropical lake, of central India, that can describe the nonlinear relationship of developmental rate to temperature for several insect species and provide an upper and lower estimated developmental threshold. The aim of this study was to examine the role of climate in determining the structure and composition of a shoreline insect community of hemiptera.
This study focused on temperature as the main variable, while holding other variables relatively constant. It is interesting to observe that most of the reports incorporating seasonal interference in the community structure and population dynamics of the hemipterans are from temperate and semi tropical regions. However this appears to be the first report from a tropical large man made lake exhibiting seasonal influences on the community structure and population density of hemipterans.
(i) Description of study area:
The Upper Lake is located in Bhopal city, the capital of Madhya Pradesh, the largest state of India. Constructed on earthen dam across the river Kolans in the 11th century created this lake, the Upper Lake has water spread area of 30.72 sq.km at FTL. The storage capacity is 101.6 million cu.m, the maximum and mean depth being 11.7 and 6 m. respectively. The Upper Lake is under a massive conservation, restoration and management project funded by Overseas Economic Cooperative Fund (OECF) Japan to protect it from environmental degradation not only due to its natural aesthetic value and rich biodiversity, but also since it is the main source of potable water. Selection of the sampling sites of the Upper Lake chiefly was done on the basis of weeds and consequent biomass sampling. Sampling was done at four sampling sites of Upper Lake viz. Bhadbhada, Van-vihar (National Park), Pump-house and Bairagarh designated as SI, SII, SIII and SIV.
(ii) Sampling of marginal insects:
To investigate the species richness and abundance of marginal hemipteran insects as well as their plant interaction a belt quadrate method (Dicks et al., 2002) was applied to the transects. The quadrates were used at the start to the end of the sampling season. Sampling stations were studied for insects in each season i.e. summer, winter and rainy. Sampling walks started between 10 to 12 am, the period of relatively high visitation by insects in the order Hemiptera were collected, and after each sampling, one specimen of each species was brought back to the laboratory to confirm identification using standard texts.
Some help in insect identification were taken from the scientist of Indian Agriculture Research Institute (I.A.R.I.) New Delhi and Zoological Survey of India (Z.S.I.), Jabalpur. The method for analysis of insect abundance and their frequency was followed as the method of Knapp (1984).


iii) Water analysis:
Sampling for water quality parameters and aquatic insects were carrying out at monthly intervals, covering dry and rainy seasons. Air and water temperatures were recorded with a thermometer, whereas pH, total alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, total hardness, calcium hardness and nutrients were determined according to APHA (2003) methods. Monthly rainfall, humidity and ambient temperature data were obtained from the meteorological station Bhopal, India.
(iv)  Collection and Identification of macrophytes:
Aquatic macrophytes are an important component of many watercourses, providing a structures and habitat for fish and invertebrates, offering protection against currents and predators, and forming a substrate for the deposition of eggs. As primary producers, macrophytes represent an important food resource, and they also play a significant role in the oxygen balance and nutrient cycle of many watercourses. In view of their varying requirements, the composition of macrophyte species in a water body makes it possible to draw conclusions about the local chemical and physical conditions. Species that prefer low nutrient concentrations, in particular, have become much less prevalent. Aquatic plants are especially sensitive to changes (increases) in nutrient concentrations (notably phosphorus and ammonium) and to organic pollutants. Samples of shoreline macrophytes were collected from different types of habitats like lake margin and identified by his guidelines given by Needham and Needham (1962) and Haslam (1978).
(v) Statistical analysis:
The data was analyzed by SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Services Version 10). Descriptive statistics such as probability, frequency, percentage and mean values were used.   
RESULTS:
The present study was conducted on the four sampling sites SI, SII, SIII, SIV of shorelines of Upper Lake, Bhopal. It is noteworthy to mention here that all the four sampling stations have significant variations in their location, distance, and physicochemical and biological parameters. The climate of Bhopal is known to be relatively moderate and dry except in the monsoon season, indicating seasonal rhythms of weather. The year is divided into three seasons viz. summer, monsoon and winter. Major part of Bhopal district lies on Malwa Plateau, where extremes of temperature are not very much marked and the climate is generally pleasant.
During the two years of study period the maximum temperature of Bhopal was noted as 40.2ºC in the month of May  and minimum ambient temperature of 10.2ºC was observed in January . Humidity of Bhopal ranged between 12.8 to 93.19%. Maximum of 93.19% was observed in August  and minimum of 12.8% was observed in April, whereas maximum rainfall of 21.67 mm was observed in July and minimum of .0003mm was in the month of May. Station wise maximum water temperature of shorelines of Upper Lake was recorded at station IV being 36.4ºC in the month of May , due to high intensity of solar radiation and significantly high rate of photosynthesis by macrophytes. On the other hand minimum water temperature of shorelines was recorded at station I being 18.5ºC in the month of December.
                          In the present study, at all the sampling stations of Upper Lake, more than 15 species of marginal hemipterans have been found to be present in varying population densities ranging from 6-60 species/20 m². Out of many species recorded in varying numbers, 5 dominant species of hemiptera such as Gerris lacustris, Hydrometra stagnorum, Belostoma indicum, Notonecta maculata, Corixa varicunda and Ranatra varipes were conspicuous throughout the study period, which ranged between 10-58 species/20m². Garris lacustris and Hydrometra stagnorum were found to be the most dominant species of hemiptera, observed maximally (24-48 species/20m²) in the months of summer, when the water and ambient temperature reached its high peak of 31.2 to 36.4ºC and 35.5 to 41.08 ºC respectively .
                                 R. Varipes, C. varicunda, N. maculata and B. indicum were the next dominant species of hemiptera, which were observed at all the sampling stations, but found most abundant (32-68 species/20²) at stations II and IV due to the favorable weather conditions and availability of their prey. In summer seasons, density of these species was found maximum (38-68 species/20m²), whereas minimum densities were observed in the rainy (18-38species/ 20m²) and winter (10-28 species/20m²) seasons respectively. These data show that high temperature regimes in summer season were responsible for enhanced growth of these marginal hemipterans. In and around the Upper Lake, apart from dominant hemiptera, there were five subdominant species, which were observed and present in different numbers in all the three seasons. The subdominant hemipterans had maximum population of Nezara viridula, Atheas exiguas and Reduvious personatus which ranged between 18-50 species/20m²; whereas Eusarcocoris ventralis and Eusarcocoris guttiger were found to be totally absent in summer season may be due to high temperature, which inhibited their growth and development.
                                 An interesting feature that was recorded during the two years of study period was regarding the shift in population of hemipterans, observed in sampling stations of Upper Lake. During the first year i.e. 2004 in summer season G. lacustris were the dominant species of lake margins, which showed population frequency of 38-42 species/20m² when the water temperature was recorded between 26-34.4ºC. However in the next year G. lacustris became subdominant and H.stagnorum and N. maculata species became dominant species in summer season (population frequency 42-48 species/20m², 48-68 species/20m²respectively) when water temperature was recorded between 28-36.4ºC. Similarly E. ventralis and A. exiguas were observed in monsoon season, when water temperature ranged between 26-34.4ºC, these hemipterans were totally absent in the next monsoon season of study period, when temperature observed 30-39ºC. Thus it appears that temperature extremes directly affects the hemipteran abundance, within the exposed shore zone, generally increased in the summer season.
In the present study the data also demonstrate that during the rainy season, additional occurrence of Charisterus antennator, Andrallus spinidens and Dysdercus cingulatus were recorded at shorelines of Upper Lake, because these hemipterans required low temperature ranges being 22.4-26.6ºC for their significant high growth. These data clearly demonstrate that seasonal variations in temperature, humidity and rainfall induced significant changes in the growth of hemipterans along with other biotic factors in a complex interplay of cascading factors.
DISCUSSION:
Temperature, humidity and rainfall are important physical parameters of any ecological study, which regulate and maintain many physiological activities in the living forms. The temperature is an important factor indicating the quality of water, influencing the aquatic life and concentration of dissolved gases and chemical solutes as well. With regard to the temperature of various sampling stations of Upper Lake, difference of 3.4ºC was found at station IV and minimal of 33ºC at station I. Interestingly changes in temperature regime coincided with the marked variations in the population levels of all insects of the order hemiptera studied. Aquatic temperature does not have the same range as air temperature and insect species usually show a definite restriction of water of a certain temperature range.
                                In the present study, season wise high temperature was recorded in summer months, which ranged 28-36.4ºC. The speed of development and activity of different insect species of order hemiptera have been found to be regulated by ambient as well as water temperature, humidity and rainfall. For hemipteran insects, these climatic factors can be undoubtedly correlated with growth and development, as it was found to be suitable for round the year development of few hemipterans such as Notonecta maculata, Belostoma indicum, Tetrix subulata, Corixa varicunda and Ranatra varipes. The egg incubation period, nymphal development, survivorship and longevity of shorelines hemipterans were influenced by climatic changes. Hatching of egg required a definite temperature; hence it influenced the developmental period of insects. Therefore maximum population abundance (3.1-3.3 species/20m²) of hemiptera such as N. maculata, G.laucustris and H. stagnorum was observed in summer and monsoon seasons, which gave favorable climate to hemipteran development. The present data are well corroborated with the earlier reports of Nebeker (1971), Ward & Standford (1983) and Careghino et al. (2003), who have stated that increased temperature accelerated the emergence of aquatic insects where high peak of population abundance was observed in summer. Similarly the recent findings of Voldovinos et al. (2007), Murray et al. (2012), Raza et al. (2014) and Sangle et al. ( 2015) also support the present data, that temperature and other climatic factors induced the growth and maturation of related fauna of the system, especially insects and mollusks.
The data of the present study further indicate that, these insects of order hemiptera, exhibited interdependence with temperature and shoreline vegetations as well and showed their high abundance in definite temperature regime dependent upon season, these observations are fully corroborated with the findings of Ward and Standford (1983), Reilly et al. (2003) and Briers and Biggs (2005) who have reported that optimum degree of temperature and abundant occurrence of marginal aquatic macrophytes such as Eicchornia crassipes, Ipomoea fistulosa, Jussiaea repence, Potamogeton pectinatus and Vallisnaria spiralis have much effect on the occurrence and peak abundance of several shoreline insects. Season wise high frequency of marginal insects of 32-68 species/20m² was recorded in summer season due to high temperature, which ranged between 28-36.4ºC, which significantly induced photosynthetic activities of shoreline vegetations. There is another factor of high insect abundance in summer, which may be due to phloem sap of grasses and forbs, which is generally accepted to be more nutritious in summer. Nitrogen contents of plant food can be crucial factor for the development and reproduction of herbivores. Stem, fruits and flowers of plants changed considerably both seasonally and during the course of plant development.       
                     As protein contents of marginal plants are known to vary during the season, many insect species of different orders were found to be more abundant in summer. These results are quite similar to the findings of Douglas (1993) and Giulio& Edwards (2003), who have reported that high temperature (30-35ºC) affects vegetation phloem saps and make them more nutritious, which seems to be attracting more insects as in the present work.
As evident from the reports of Ewers and Didham (2006), Taki and Kewan (2007) and Clarke et al. (2008), it has been observed that there is a broad correlation between climatic factors viz. temperature, humidity and rainfall on the occurrence and development of shoreline insects. On comparing population abundance of shoreline hemipterans at different sampling stations of Upper Lake, maximum abundance was observed in summer. This may attributed to the favorable weather conditions, balance nutrient levels and of course optimum temperature for development, growth and maturation, therefore occurrence of shoreline insect was found to be dependent on the climatic factors, which accelerated seasonally. It is interesting to observe that most of the reports incorporating seasonal interference in the community structure and population dynamics of the hemipterans are from temperate and semi tropical regions. However this appears to be the first report from a tropical large man made lake exhibiting seasonal influences on the community structure and population density of hemipterans.
Conclusion:
Climate change is one of the most crucial and influential ecological problems of our age; therefore large numbers of investigations are required to deal with this problem, which is increasing permanently. Climatic changes and variability can influence aquatic ecosystem in a very sensitive way, so the research of the possible effects of climate change on aquatic ecosystem means an indispensable task. In the present study it has been observed that the optimum degree of temperature of 28-36ºC and abundant occurrence of marginal aquatic macrophytes have much affects on the occurrence and peak abundance of marginal hemipterans of Upper Lake. In the present work it was also observed that climatic factors such as temperature, humidity and rainfall accelerated the dominance of hemipterans and showed shift in population frequency each year. Since we do not have the chance to reverse global warming and climate change phenomena, the only thing that needs to be done is to minimize the foreseen harms in the future. To this end, mankind needs to understand the global warming problem and cooperate on an international level using aquatic model studies of invertebrate and vertebrate species preferably in large tropical water bodies, which are on the brink of eutrophication and extinction. Upper Lake of Bhopal the largest man made lake built by Raja Bhoj in AD 1100 is such an example, which needs to be of major concern from conservational aspects.
REFERENCES:
Adandedjan D., Laleye P., Ouattara A. and Gourene G., 2010. Distribution of benthic fauna in a West African Lagoon: The Porto Novo Lagoon in Benin. Asian J. Biol. Sci., 4:116-127.
Andrew N.R. and L. Hughes, 2004. Species diversity and structure of phytophagous beetles assemblages along a latitudinal gradient: predicting the potential impact of climate change. Ecol. Entomol, 29, 527-542.
APHA, 2003. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 23rd ed. American Public Health Association, Washington DC, Pp. 1134.
Boyero L., 2002. Insect biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems: is there any latitudinal gradient? Marine and freshwater Research, 53, 753-755.
Briere J.F., Pascale P., Alain Y.L.R. and Jeans S.P., 1999. A novel rate model of temperature-dependent development for arthropods. Environ. Entomol, 28(1): 22-29.
Briers R. A. and Biggs J., 2003. Indicator taxa for the conservation of pond invertebrate diversity. Aquatic conservation. Marine and Freshwater Ecosystem, 13, 323-330.
Briers R.A. and Biggs J., 2005. Spatial patterns in Pond invertebrate communities: separating environmental and distance effects. Aquatic conservation. Marine and Fresh water ecosystem 15, 549-557.
Careghino R., Park V., Compin A. and Lek S., 2003. Predicting the species richness of aquatic insects in streams using a limited number of environmental variables. Journal of North Americal Benthological Society 22, 442-456.
Clarke A., MacNally R., Bond N. and Lake P.S., 2008. Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review. Fresh water Biology 53, 1707-1721.
Dicks L.V., Corbet S.A., Pywell R.F., 2003. Compartmentalization in plant-insect flower visitor web. J. Animal Ecol., 71, 32-43.
Douglas A.E., 1993. The nutritional quality of phloem sap utilized by natural aphids population, Ecological entomology, and 18. 31-38.
Ewers R.M. and Didham R.K., 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological  Rev. 81: 117-142.
Giulio M.D. and Edwards P.J., 2003. The influence of host plant diversity and food quality on larval survival of plant feeding heteropteran bugs. Swiss Federal Res. Sta. Agroeco. And Geobotanical Ins. Zurich, Switzerland. Ecol Ent. 28, 51-57.
Greenfield J.P. and Ireland M.P., 1978. A survey of the macro fauna of coal. Waste polluted Lanka Shreflurial system. Environ. Pollution, 16, 105-127.
Haslam S.M., 1978. River Plants: The macrophyte vegetation of watercourse, Cambridge University Press, London, Pp. 396.
Heino J., 2009. Biodiversity of aquatic insects: Spatial gradients and environmental correlates of assemblage level measures at large scale. Freshwater Reviews 2 (1): 1-29, doi:10.1608/FRJ-2.1.1
Hurd L.E., Eisenberg R.M., Moren M.D., Rooney T.P., Gangloff W.J. and Case V.M., 1995. Time, temperature and food as a detriment of population persistence in a temperate mantid Tenodera sinensis , population ecol. Pp.348-353.
Knapp R., 1984. Conservations on quantitative parameters and qualitative attributes in vegetation analysis: Sampling method and taxon analysis. Vegetation Science, W.J. publication hague, 958pp.
Memmott  J., 1999. The structure of plant pollinator food web. Ecol. Lett. 2:276-280.
Murray S. J., Foster P. N., Prentice I. C., 2012. Future global water resources with respect to climate change and water withdrawals as estimated by a dynamic global vegetation model. Journal of Hydrology 448:14-29.
Nebeker A.V., 1971. Effect of high water temperature on adult insects. Water res.,Pergamon Press, 777-783.
Needham J.G. and Needham P.R., 1962. A guide of the study of freshwater biology. Holdeom day Inc. San. Francisco. Pp. 108.
Plantegnest M., 1995. Modelisation de la dynamique du puceron des epis (sitobion avenae) sur le ble d’ hiver au printemps et en etc. Application au raisonnement de la lutte chimique. These de Doctorate de I’ Universite Francois Rehalais, Tours.
Raza M.M., Khan M.S., Arshad M. et al., 2014: Impact of global warming on insects. Archives Of phytopathology and plant protection, http//dx.doi.org/10.1080/03235408, 882132.
Reilly C.M.O., Alin S.R., Plisnier P.D., Cohen A.S., Mckee B.A., 2003. Climate change decreases aquatic system productivity of Lake Tanganyika, Africa. Nature, 424, 766-768.doi: 10.1038/nature 01833.
Root T.L., Price, J.T., Hall, K.R., Schneider S.H., Rosenzweig C. and Pounds J.A., 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature, 421, 57-60.
Sangle P. M., Sushil Satpute,Khan F. S., Nilesh Rode, 2015. Impact of climate change on Insects. Trends in Bioscience 8(14), Print : ISSN, 0974-8, 3579-3582.
Shin-Ya O., Hitoshii K., Gabriel D., Duncan J., George S., Noboru M.,Masahiro T., 2010. Predators of anopheles Gambiae sensu lato (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae in wetlands, western Kenya: confirmation by polymerase chain reaction methods. J. of medical Entomol, vol.47.5, pp.783-787(5).
Taki h. and P.G. Kevan, 2007. Does habitat loss affect the communities of plants and insects equally in plant pollinator interactions, preliminary findings. Biodivers. Conserv.16, 3147-3161.
Tilman D., Wedin D. and Knops J., 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379, 718-720.
Taki Hisatoma and P. G. Kewan, 2007. Does habitat loss affect the communities of plants and insects equally in plant pollinator interaction, preliminary findings. Biodiversity Conservation, 16, 3147-3161.
Voldovinos C., Carolinan M., Viviana O.,Oscar P., Bernhard K. and Olaf  B., 2007. The importance of water level fluctuation for the conservation of shallow water benthic macroinvertebrates: an example in the Andean zone of Chile. Biodivers. Cons., 16; 3095-3109.
Ward J.V. and Stanford J.A., 1983. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: an explanation for biotic diversity patterns in lotic ecosystems. Fontaine, T.D. & Bartell(eds), 347-356. Ann- Arbor Science, Ann- Arbor.
Walther G. R., Post E., Convey P., Menzel A.P., Beebee J.J.C., 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389-395.
William, J.O., 1998. Influence of temperature and humidity on the

biology of insecticide-resistant and susceptible strains of Tribolium


Castaneum (herbst.): Coleoptera Tenebrionidae. Insect Sci., Applic,


vol.10, no.5, 607-625.



follow me on :
Twitter


Thursday, 25 July 2019

Fluctuation of water level: A new abiotic index for studying insect biodiversity variations, in a large waterbody.


Dr.Asma Ali (Ecologist)





Many researchers have shown the importance of water chemistry and benthic habitat characteristics for the conservation of the freshwater macroinvertebrate biodiversity. However very few authors have examined the physical effects of extreme water level fluctuations in lakes. 

The present study set out to determine, through a comparative study between four sampling stations of Upper Lake, how water level fluctuation affect the structure of the shoreline macroinvertebrate communities. The present paper investigates the influence of water level fluctuations on the community indices of shoreline insect’s assemblage and discusses the role of disturbance, physical parameters and biological interactions in structuring communities of shoreline insects in Upper Lake.



INTRODUCTION: 

Numerous studies have been conducted on the impact of the stream regulation on the various biotic communities (Hoffman and Kilambi 1970,Lehmkuhl 1972, Trotosky and Gregorry 1974) of temperate water bodies. Some investigations were carried out on the distribution and long-term changes of benthic invertibrate communities in relations to flow characteristics (Armitage & Pardo 1995, Bickerton 1995, Fjellhein 1996, Hamill 2009).

In lake habitate, water level fluctuations plays an important role in structuring macroinvertebrate communities (Resh et al. 1998, Richter et al., 2003, Voldovinos et al.,2007) . Particularly in large lakes, shore zones is affected by water flow variations and drying up, both of which affect community and population structure of shoreline communities. Shorelines of large lakes offer a wide range from periodically to permanently flooded areas. In such a gradient, ecological theory predicts that maximum species diversity is reached in sites with medium frequency and intensity of disturbance ( Connel 1978, Hutson 1979).



MATERIALS AND METHODS:

                                      The present study was conducted on the four sampling sites of shorelines of Upper Lake Bhopal. The site Upper Lake of Bhopal, is a vast man-made lake of the capital city of Madhya Pradesh , a centrally located state of India. The essential features of the Upper Lake are given in table 1. Four sampling stations of Upper Lake were taken to study the effect of water level fluctuation i.e. Bhadbhada (S1), Van-vihar (SII), Pump-house (SIII) and Bairagarh (SIV).

    Table-1: Essential statistics of the Upper Lake of Bhopal ( India).
Period of construction
11th Century A.D.

Type of Dam
Earthen

Location
Latitude
Longitude
23º12’-23º16’N
77º 18,-77º 23’E
Periodicity of water level fluctuation
Seasonal

Trophic status
Oligotrophic

Catchment area (Sq.km. )
361

Submergence area at FTL (Sq. km. )
36.54

Full tank level(MSL)m.
508.65

Dead storage level (MSL) m.
503.53

Storage capacity (million Cu.m)
117.05

Maximum depth(m)
11.7

Designed flood discharge(Cu.m /sec. )
2208

Source of water
Rain water

Main use of water
Potable water supply

Inflow points (Nos.)
31

Sewage water inflow (MLD)
50.47


              Sampling was carried out at monthly intervals regularly for a period of 24 months. Water samples for chemical analysis were collected from four sampling stations in the morning hours between 10 AM to 12 PM. Excepting water level fluctuation, temperature, transparency and pH all parameters such as Chloride, Calcium hardness, Total hardness, Alkalinity, Dissolved oxygen were analyzed in the laboratory by APHA(1998) methods. 

The insect fauna was collected by transect method using insect net ( Knapp,1998; Taki and Kevan 2007 ) in field based upon the different preservation methods for variable insect orders. Shoreline insects of each sampling station were identified to major taxonomic groups and counted.


Data analysis:

                    Sampling sites were characterized through an index that quantifies the extent of drying up over two years. For each sampling point the area under the water level curve when the actual water level was below the sampling point was calculated as distance to actual water level in meters.

RESULTS:

                  The climate of Bhopal is relatively moderate and dry except in the monsoon season, indicating a seasonal rhythm of weather. During the two years of study period the maximum ambient temperature was recorded 46 degree.

Rainfall was observed between .0003 to 21.67 mm.Whereas the water level in Upper Lake is regulated by an earthen dam towards the east, near the Kamla park from where, there is a regular seepage, which forms the main source of water for the lower lake and a Bhadbhada weir towards the south having a sluice gate for releasing excess water into Kaliasot dam. Thus fluctuation of water level of Upper Lake is seasonal and temporary.

The total 83 species of different orders were recorded at all four sampling stations of shorelines of Upper Lake during the study period. The total number of taxa was recorded slightly higher at stations II and IV then stations I and III. Low water period in summer season due to drying up, station I showed maximum water level fluctuation from actual sampling point (minus m.) and the most capable species of order strepsiptera became dominant, whilst some odonatans, dipterans and coleopterans become rare in the same season. 

On the other hand adults of orthopterans, hemipterans and lepidopterans abundance was not found to be associated with high intensity of water level fluctuations, due to the migratory nature of insects belonging to these orders.


Table-2: Mean abundance of shoreline macroinvertebrates per m² at all sampling stations of Upper Lake during two years).
Orders
        SI
      SII
      SIII
    SIV
Hemiptera
2.24
3.42
2.45
2.86
Hymenoptera
-
4.8
1.36
1.45
Strepsiptera
2.18
1.95
-
1.32
Dictyoptera
0.73
1.16
1.11
1.16
Odonata
3.7
3.08
4.96
4.93
Lepidoptera
2.17
3.33
2.20
3.32
Diptera
6.6
4.75
4.18
3.26
Orthoptera
3.2
3.91
3.14
4.2
Coleoptera
2.48
3.5
2.96
3.43

At station III water level fluctuations were a function of changes in the amount of water in lakes. These fluctuations, generally short in duration, were due to wind or barometric pressure and seasonal, because the Upper Lake was generally at their lowest levels in the summer months at all sampling stations.

In the summer, when the air above the lake was warm and moist and the lake was relatively warm, evaporation from the lake was great. With more water leaves the lake then entered, the water level decline to their seasonal lows, similarly evaporation from the lakes was least in the early winter when the air above the lakes was cold and moist and the lake was cold, condensation on the lake surface replaced evaporation. In the rainy season, more water entered in to lake, than left, this process caused water level rise (fig.1).
                
Table-3: a List of several shoreline insects/20m² collected at all four sampling stations of Upper Lake of Bhopal during two years of study period.


Taxa

Order

SI

SII

SIII

SIV

N. maculata
Hemiptera
506
220
396
624

H.stagnorum

  -,,-    
522
425
724
672

B.indicum

   -,,-
396
400
518
396

G.lacustris

   -,,-    
542
578
470
672

C. varicunda

   -,,-
356
424
258
362

R.varipes

   -,,-
440
588
404
828
N.viridula
   -,,-
196
236
316
278
P.auriculacea
Coleoptera
658
612
466
762

P.albuguttata

  -,,-
626
622
612
622
C.septempunctata
   -,,-
692
644
318
422
D. indicus
   -,,-
499
414
554
606
D. unidentatus
   -,,-
488
366
268
144
Boyeria
Odonata
404
532
374
206

Brachythemis

   -,,-
286
422
336
314
S. striolatum
   -,,-
220
273
258
268
L.quadrimaculata
   -,,-
120
274
356
226
I. elegans
   -,,-
240
256
292
308
P. numphulla
   -,,-
-
82
-
-
A. crenulata
Ortoptera
398
382
402
330
G.africana
   -,,-
-
382
338
206
P. spumarius
   -,,-
-
344
130
-
P. griseoaptera
   -,,-
-
126
-
104
S. gregaria
   -,,-
4014
288
550
322

C. trachypterus

   -,,-
282
330
-
294
C. spenariodes
   -,,-
-
430
-
332
T. tendipes
   Diptera
446
530
503
535
T. kiffrulus
    -,,-
520
620
538
304
D. baumbauri
    -,,-
262
432
381
355
D. irrorata
   -,,-
220
280
349
205
C. longiarolata
   -,,-
428
544
260
-
B. wallaci
Strepsiptera
225
202
-
104

X. adusta

   -,,-
320
224
-
94

   At station II and Iv the high growth of aquatic plants such as Eichhornia crassipes, Potamogeton pectinatus, P.nousus, Lemna minor, Leersia hexendra and Vallisnaria spiralis affected the flow of water. Plant growth is part depended on the weather, and vary from month to month and year to year. In the summer, aquatic plant growth reduced the flow of water on average by 2 percent, therefore due to dense population abundance of shoreline macrophytes  at stations II and IV helped to decrease fluctuation in water level and also decreased possibility of habitat loss for marginal insects, which is a major threat to biodiversity and ecosystem function. 

Interestingly fluctuated water, picked up materials, aquatic plants from shoreline areas and deposited them wherever the water is slowed down and picked up again when the velocity of the water increased. This process  the equilibrium of aquatic ecosystem, with regard to littoral vegetation and insect abundance. It was also observed that fluctuated water picked up nutrients and deposited them at shoreline zone which increased nutrient level of lake margins and promote dense abundance of flora and fauna.

Table-4: List of several shoreline macrophytes and their population abundance/20m² at all four sampling stations of Upper Lake.
Shoreline vegetation
Bhadbhada(SI)
Van-vihar(SII)
PumpHouse(SIII)
Bairagarh(SIV)
I.aquatica
24
152
43
116
I.fistulosa
26
148
34
107
C. demersum
34
88
34
64
H. Verticillata
36
55
13
40
A. pinnata
16
38
-
34

Najas minor

54
142
53
112
P. pectinatus
44
170
36
166
P.crispus
54
152
52
140
E. crassipus
78
182
40
140
L. hexeandra
34
120
25
118
A.philoxroides
48
80
18
86
J. repens
54
90
46
98
P.glabrum
40
52
34
84
V. spiralis
56
92
38
154
M.spathulatum
80
34
30
88

P.hysterophorus

-
76
-
106
C.forskalli
36
40
22
46

L.minor

70
66
65
96

        In the present study it was observed that several species of order Odonata (,Brachythemis Sympetrum steriolatum, Libellula quadrimaculata, Ishnaru elegans ,Pyrrhosoma numphulla and nainads), Orthoptera (Atrectomorpha crenulata, Gastrimargus africana, Philaenus spumarius and Pholidoptera griseoaptera ) and Diptera (Dioctria baumbauri and Dolicocephala irrorata) were seriously affected at station I through decline in water level in summer . 

On the other hand migratory nature of certain adults of shoreline insects belonging to orders, Hemiptera  (,Notonecta maculata, Hydrometra stagnorum Gerris lacustris,Corixa varicunda and Nazara viridula) Coleoptera (Protaetia, Aurichalacea, Dineutus indicus, Dineutus unidentatus) and Strepsiptera (Batocera wallacei, Xylorhiza adusta)  were not found to be affected by water level fluctuation during the study period; because the subtle changes in water level of Upper Lake gave time to adult shoreline insect to maintain their population abundance by migration towards the favorable habitat (Table-3).


                      (A)


     (B)



    (C)



                          (D)

Fig-1 (A-D): Monthly water level fluctuations at different sampling stations of Upper Lake of Bhopal (India)

DISCUSSION:

Many researchers have shown the importance of water chemistry and benthic habit characteristics of lakes, for the conservation of freshwater macroinvertebrate biodiversity (Brodersen et al. 1998, Allan and Flecker 1993). In contrast, few authors have given attention to the physical effect of extreme water level fluctuation of lakes on the conservation of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages. This situation contrasts with the case of the rivers, in which abundant information exists (Galat & Lipkin 2000, Richter et al. 2003). The impact of water level fluctuation on shoreline insects as observed in the present study has been documented for the first time in tropical waterbody, particularly in freshwater lake.

In the present study significant difference occurred in the abundance of shoreline insects community at all sampling stations The amplitude and patterns of water - level fluctuations exhibited by different unregulated natural lakes are highly variable. In Upper lake, water level remains constant over a long period and showed considerable short term variations. Fluctuation in water level increased in summer, when there were high ambient temperature (35.5-41.2ºC), high wind velocity and low air humidity (12.8-44.7%) which facilitated desiccation of the first few meters of the substrate.
Temperature extremes and desiccation directly affect the marginal insects within the exposed shore zone (Palomaki 1994, Hamill 2009). However, water - level fluctuations also influence the benthic communities of chironomidae and offsprings of odonata, diptera, coleoptera and hemiptera, indirectly by reducing or eliminating aquatic plants, modifying chemical conditions, and increasing erosion, thereby altering the benthic habitat (Batzer & Wissinger 1996, Friday 1987, Keddy & Reznicek 1986, Palomaki 1994 and Voldovinos et al. 2007). Marginal surface inhabiting insects were not found to be much affected by water level fluctuations in the present study at stations II, III and IV because of the high population abundance of shoreline vegetations, which caused decline of water level fluctuations.
    The present investigation revealed that no significant differences occurred in the abundance of shoreline insect communities at highly dense vegetation sampling stations such as SII and SIV of Upper Lake. Maximum diversity of insect fauna was observed at station II that had intermediate disturbance levels of water fluctuation due to dense population abundance of marginal vegetations of Upper Lake. Because shoreline macrophytes of any waterbody helps to reduce water fluctuation and provides holistic environment to marginal fauna, including insects and mollusks.Similar results with respect to invertebrate species diversity have been reported in several other rivers by Ward & Stanford 1983 ,Robinson & Minshall 1986 and Reckendorfer et.al. 1996.
           Low water level in summer, showed maximum number of shoreline insect, ranged between 3.9 to 14.6 sps/m2. Shallow nature of lake margin and peak abundance of marginal free floating macrophytes in summer, provides hiding place and prey to shoreline insects whereas decomposed rooted macrophytes helped to increase their population abundance. The effect of drying up in sustaining high species diversity has been demonstrated in seasonal oxbow lakes and wetlands and it has been proposed that the removal of organism during low-water periods may account for high marginal insect species richness (Outridge 1987, Growns et al. 1992, Balla & Davies 1995).
    Diversity and abundance of marginal insects depend on the evenness of water level of any waterbody. Species richness showed a curvilinear relationship with disturbance, but the initial increase was less steep than in diversity. Evenness of water level was positively related to insect diversity where a close relationship between insect abundance and water level fluctuation implies that a habitat is species-saturated (Mackey 1977, Drade 1982, Tockner 1993). In such a situation, deterministic processes which gain considerable importance and the most capable species of order strepsiptera such as Xylorhiza adusta (320 species/20m²) and Batocera wallacii (225 species/20m²) becomes more dominant in high fluctuation of water level than other insect species of different order of station I of shoreline of Upper Lake in summer.
    Our results suggested that in Upper lake margins, water level fluctuation effect more on benthic macroinvertebrates such as Chironomids than the other shoreline insects, because changes of water level at Upper lake margins were found to be seasonal and subtle, which effect only benthic or sessile macroinvertebrate animals (Tockner 1993, Reckendorfer 1996). Although marginal insects of order coleoptera, Hemiptera, Strepsiptera and Odonata showed migratory nature, which supported them to survive on the water body where water level decline and rise, seasonally.
    Dense growth of aquatic weeds such Eichhornia Apenogeton, Leersia, Potemogeton, Vallisnaria, Verbascum, Polygonum and Ipomoea at station II and IV found to be responsible to decrease the flow of water and maintain evenness of water level. Thus low fluctuation values at these stations don’t leave any large impact on shoreline insects.


References:
Allana J.D., Flecker A.S. (1993): Biodiversity conservation in running waters. Bio science 43 : 32 - 43.
American Public Health Association (APHA) (1998): Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Waste Water. 20th Ed. Washington, D.C. USA. 1113 pages
Batzer, D.P., Wissinger, S.A. (Armitage, P.D. & I. Pardo (1995): Impact of assessment of regulation at the reach level using macroinvertebrate information from mesohabitate. Regulated, rivers: research & management 10: 147 - 158.
1996): Ecology of insect communities on nontidal wetlands. Annu Rev. Entomol 41 : 75 - 100.
Balla, S.A. & Davies, J.A. (1995): Seasonal variation in the macroinvertebrate fauna of wetlands of differing water regime and nutrient status on the Swan coastal plain, Western Australia. Hydrobiologia 299: 147 - 161.
Bickerton, M.A. (1995): Long term changes of macroinvertebrate communities in relation to flow variations: The river Glen. Lincolnshire, England. Regulated rivers: Res & Manag - 10: 81 - 92.
Briggs, J.C. (1948): The quantitative effects of dam upon the bottom fauna of small California stream. Transactions of American Fishery Society 78: 70 - 81.
Brodersen et al. (1998): The invertebrate fauna in the Upper stony littoral of Danish lakes; Machoinvertebrates as trophic indicators. Fresh Biol. 39: 577 - 592.
Connell, J. (1978): Diversity in tropical rain forest and coral reefs: Science 199 : 1304 - 1310.
Drake, G.M. (1982) : Seasonal dynamics of chironomidae (Diptera) on the Bulrush Schoenoplectus lacustris in a chalk stream - fresh wod. Bio. 12: 225 - 240.
Fjellhein, A. (1996): Distribution of benthic macroinvertebrate in relation to stream flow characteristics in a Norwegian river. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 263 - 271.
Friday, L.E. (1987): The diversity of macroinvertebrate and macrophyte communities in ponds. Freshwater Biol. 18: 87 - 104.
Galat D.L., Lipkin, R. (2000): Restoring the ecological integrity of great rivers, historical hydrongraphs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River. Hydro. biol. 422 / 423 : 29 - 48.
Growns, J.E. et al. (1992): Multi variant pattern analysis of wetland invertebrate communities and environmental variables in Western Australia - Aust. J. Ecol. 17: 275 – 288.
Hamill Keith (2009): Ecological effects of proposed changes in lake Rotoiti water level and range of fluctuation. Okere Gates Control Str. Consents,Opus house, Princes, Stret, Private Bag 3057,Hamilton, New Zealand pp.1-37.
Hoffman, C.E. & R.V. Kilambi (1970): Environmental changes produced by coldwater outlets from three Arkanbsas reservoirs; water resources centre publication No. 5, Uni Arkansas, Fayeterville.
Huston, M. (1979): A general hypothesis of species diversity - Am. Nat. 113: 81 - 101.
Hynes, H.B.N. (1970): The ecology of stream insects. Annual review of entomology 15: 25 - 42.
Keddy, P.A., Reznicek, A.A. (1986): Great lakes vegetation dynamics: the role of fluctuating water levels and buried seeds. J Great lakes Res. 12: 25 - 36.
Lehmkuhl, D.M. (1972): Change in the thermal regime as a cause of reduction of benthic fauna downstream of a reservoir. Journal of fisheries research Board Canada 29 : 1329 - 1332.
Palomaki, R. (1994): Response by macrozoobenthos biomass to water level regulation in some
Finnish lake littoral zones. Hydrobiologia 286: 17 - 26.
Reckendorfer w., H.Keckeis, G. Winkler and F. Schiemer (1996): Water level fluctuation as a determinant of chironomidae community structure in the inshore zone of a large temperate river. Ach. Hydrobiology. Suppl.115, 3-9.
Resh, V.H. et al. (1988): The role of disturbance in stream ecology, J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7 : 433 - 455.
Richter et al. (2003): Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity, Ecol. Appl. 13: 206 - 224.
Robinson, C.T. & Minshall, G.W. (1986): Effects of disturbance frequency on stream benthic community structure in relation to canopy cover and season, J.N. Am. Benthol Soc. 5: 237 - 248.
Pftizer, D.W. (1954): Investigations of waters below storage reservoir in Tennessee. Transactions of North American Wildlife conference, 19: 271 - 282.
Sugunan, V.V. & V. Pathak (1986): Temporal and spatial variation of periphyton in Nagarjun Sagar reservoir, Andhra Pradesh (India) and a new method for periphyton collection from India Reservoirs, Jour. of Ind. Fish. Soc. 18: 20 - 23.
Tockner, K. (1993): Ein Beitrag zur Okologie der Uferbereiche der osterreichischen Donau - PhD. thesis Uni. Of Vienna 331p.
Trotosky, H.N. and R.W. Gregory (1974): The effects of water flow manipulation below a hydroelectric power dam on the bottom fauna of the upper Kennebec, river, Main e. Transactions of American Fisheries Society 103 : 318 - 324.
Voldovinos C., Moya C., Olmos V., Parra o., Karrasch B. and Buettner O. (2007) : The importence of water level fluctuation for the conservation of shallow water benthic macroinvertibrates; an example in the Andean zone of Chile
Word, J.V. and Stanford, J.A. (1983): The intermediate - Disturbance hypothesis: an explanation for biotic diversity patterns in lotic ecosystems. Fontaine, T.D. & Bartell (eds), 347 - 356. Ann - Arbor Science, Ann Arbor.


follow me on :
Twitter




   

   

Why do people copy a person?

  Identity theft ! Someone is trying to take away your uniqueness. by Dr. Asma Ali (Ecologist)   Let me take you to 20 years back, where r...